- AMSAT-BB - mailman.amsat.org

CW to ringtones (was Re: Re: Noise problem)
by Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK) 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

> There are websites that will convert your CW to ringtones FOR FREE....one > guy went as far as assigning all his "friends and family" individual > ringtones of their names in CW... There are programs that do the same thing. Some are $$$ but I have used one free Windows program called Morse Midi by VE3NEA: http://www.netvampire.com/ham/#MorseMidi I've used this for a couple of years, and have had no problems with the MIDI files generated by the program. It's a good way to know if my phone is the one ringing, if I hear the CW coming from it. 73! Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK - Phoenix, Arizona USA http://www.wd9ewk.net/

1 0

Re: Just got a visual on the ISS!!!!
by G. Beat 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

RoD - Wait until the second truss and set of solar arrays is installed on next shuttle flight (Atlantis, STS-115) next week !! That should improve the magnitude a bit more :-) w9gb Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:36:00 -0400 From: "Stargate" <stargatesg1(a)verizon.net> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Just got a visual on the ISS!!!! The thing that surprised me the most was how BIG it appears to be in the sky. What I could see with the naked eye looked like 2 large squares, connected at the points. VERY inspiring!! I wish I had taken my binoculars out with me. I will be watching for other passes. Strange thing is, I didn't hear any activity on 145.800. I figured I would hear some kind of activity. RoD KD0XX

3 2

Re: Noise problem
by George Henry 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

Other cell phones also send "SMS" in CW when you receive a text message........ George, KA3HSW -----Original Message----- >From: Nate Duehr <nate(a)natetech.com> >Sent: Aug 23, 2006 12:17 PM >To: amsat-bb(a)amsat.org >Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Noise problem > > >On Aug 23, 2006, at 9:18 AM, Bruce Bostwick wrote: > >> My neighbor at work drives me up the wall playing with his >> cellphone. I have to listen closely to it to be able to tell that >> it's not 5 WPM CW. ;-) (And it's just the right pitch to sound sort >> of like a navaid beacon on the aviation bands too .. which gets my >> brain really confused.) > >Many Nokia cell phones' "Loud and Long" ring tone setting sends >"Connecting People" in 5 WPM CW. > >Always wondered the history behind that... hams at Nokia? :-) > >-- >Nate Duehr - WY0X >nate(a)natetech.com

1 0

Re: Noise problem
by jules＠g0nzo.co.uk 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

Also known as 'Contest Ear'. After listening for traces of weak CW for 12 hours, you start to hear them in any noise. You also hear them after the contest is over and you are well away from the radio! > > I think when you want you hear and see things that are > not there. You just hear/see them because you mind > expect it to be there (even you are not aware of it). >

8 8

Satellite tracking on Handheld PC
by McGrane 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

Greetings from Patrick, N2OEQ I need advice on tracking satellites with a handheld PC ( not pocket PC ) I recently recieved a NEC mobilepro 750c HPC with a MIPS R4000 processor. I downloaded a DOS emulation program and tried running the DOS STSPLUS program. The map took 25 minutes to draw so this is impractical. Any ideas or experience would be appreciated. Thanks in advance for your suggestions, pat

5 5

Re: ISS ham radio trio getting ready for space shuttleAtlantis
by Ransom, Kenneth G. (JSC-OC)[BAR] 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

Flight rules require the amateur radios to be turned off for any EVA and for any Russian vehicle docking/undocking operation. No other events are specified. Kenneth - N5VHO -----Original Message----- From: amsat-bb-bounces(a)amsat.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Trevor Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 2:16 AM To: AMSAT BB Subject: [amsat-bb] ISS ham radio trio getting ready for space shuttleAtlantis ISS ham radio trio getting ready for space shuttle Atlantis http://www.southgatearc.org/news/august2006/ready_for_atlantis.htm I've heard the Amateur transmitters onboard ISS are turned off during Spacewalks does anyone know if they are also turned off during orbital maneuvers as well ? 73 Trevor M5AKA --------------- Daily Amateur Radio RSS News: http://www.southgatearc.org/ News On Your Website: http://www.southgatearc.org/rss/index.htm News On Your PC: http://www.southgatearc.org/rss/newsreader.htm Upload Your News: http://www.southgatearc.org/news/your_news.htm --------------- ___________________________________________________________ Try the all-new Yahoo! Mail. "The New Version is radically easier to use" - The Wall Street Journal http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html _______________________________________________ Sent via AMSAT-BB(a)amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author. Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program! Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

1 0

67 Hz PL Frequency Tolerance?
by Bill Ress 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

I've looked through the AMSAT web site and the AO-51 book but can't any information about the frequency tolerance of the satellite receive system to the 67 Hz PL tone. I believe someone way back when actually did some measurements after it was launched but I can't find it either. Does +/- 2 Hz sound right? What about the level (deviation) require? Is it the same for the Mode V and L receivers? Regards and thanks...Bill - N6GHz

3 2

News from the ESA International Space Station Human Spaceflight and Exploration pages
by Félim Doyle M3HIM 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

ESA astronaut Thomas Reiter's 3 August spacewalk from the ISS http://www.esa.int/esaHS/SEM490815QE_iss_0.html ESA astronaut Hans Schlegel assigned to European Columbus laboratory mission to the ISS http://www.esa.int/esaHS/SEM8VDBUQPE_iss_0.html German Chancellor makes in-flight call to ISS http://www.esa.int/esaHS/SEMHI0BUQPE_iss_0.html 73 de Félim M3HIM IO91ot Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK

1 0

Re: High Power 10m Uplink to PCSAT2
by G0MRF＠aol.com 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

In a message dated 22/08/2006 22:31:17 GMT Standard Time, bruninga(a)usna.edu writes: We need high power 10 meter CW or PSK stations to test The PCSAT2 10m ==> 2m transponder asap. PCSAT2 mission ends on 30 August (just 8 days away) and To date, no one has reported using the 10m uplink to 435 MHz downlink transponder. We know the transponder Is quite deaf, but to date, for the last several months We have not had any reports of anyone making the transponder Or even trying. Hello Bob. For the record: I had a successful PSK31 QSO via PCSAT2 with Peter G3PLX shortly before the sensitivity dropped. At that time 100W to a dipole was QRO. 2 days later while testing Peter's 'doppler tracking' version of the PSK31 software, the sensitivity dropped by at least 15dB. Thanks David G0MRF

1 0

Re: Missing postings to AMSAT-BB
by George Henry 23 Aug '06

23 Aug '06

Have you checked the archives to see whether your messages are, in fact, getting thru, but you're just not seeing them? Here is the "author index" listing for you from the current AMSAT-BB archive, as of today: Félim Doyle M3HIM Re: ISS SSTV Re: iss sstv? 144.490? Re: ISS SSTV Doppler Shift :-) Re: Doppler Shift :-) Re: 8 SSTV pictures received from ISS Space Station. Missing postings to AMSAT-BB Re: Missing postings to AMSAT-BB Re: Missing postings to AMSAT-BB Re: Missing postings to AMSAT-BB And here is the listing for you from the SAREX archive: Félim Doyle M3HIM Doppler Shift :-) Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Doppler Shift :-) Re: [amsat-bb] 8 SSTV pictures received from ISS SpaceStation. Looks to me like the message you referred to below actually DID make it.... George, KA3HSW -----Original Message----- >From: Félim Doyle M3HIM <Felim.M3HIM(a)ntlworld.com> >Sent: Aug 22, 2006 1:15 AM >To: George Henry <ka3hsw(a)earthlink.net>, amsat bb <amsat-bb(a)amsat.org> >Subject: Re: [amsat-bb] Re: Missing postings to AMSAT-BB > >An original message entitled "[amsat-bb] Doppler Shift :-)" did get through >but a subsequent follow-up with the same subject did not. However both >messages made it to SAREX. Hence I believe that MajorDomo(a)amsat.org does not >agree with my sense of humour and is filtering my jokes! Actually, this has >occurred with far less frivolous postings too, both with original postings >and replies to postings from others. So filtering based on the subject seems >to be an unlikely culprit. > >73 de > >Félim M3HIM >IO91ot >Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire, UK

3 2